These waterways provide valued places for swimming, boating and other recreation, a home for aquatic plants and animals, a source of food, water for drinking, hydroelectricity, and irrigation for horticulture and agriculture.
Tasman District Council works to ensure all these values are maintained or enhanced and that our district’s resources are used in a sustainable way. The council monitors surface water quality across the district. Surface water quality applies to rivers, streams, lakes, and beaches. In this section you will find information on the health of our surface water resources.
The main threats to water quality are the intensification of agriculture and the growth in population. The council monitors more than 50 sites across the district for water quality and works with the community and industry to ensure we have a sustainable resource for the future. Some of our rivers and streams have changed dramatically since European settlement. These have been dammed, had water pumped out or diverted, waste discharged into them, or invasive plants introduced. The land draining into these rivers (their catchment area) has been cleared for agriculture, forestry and urban development. These activities all increase the amount of runoff entering rivers and streams.
Many of the district’s rivers and streams are probably in better condition now than they were half a century ago, but they continue to be affected by pollution from a variety of sources, including runoff and leaching from agricultural land, stormwater and industrial discharges.
This dashboard shows information on the data collected by the regional councils for water quality indicators, analysed as
The state for the region is represented by theconcentration for the across all sites within the region and then compares that value to the for all monitored sites in New Zealand.
Click on the parameters state icons to compare this region with others nationally.
State shows how theof samples from this site compares to other sites
Trend shows how the quality of water is changing over time. Depending on the sampling history duration, five and ten year timescales are available:
The Cawthron Institute has worked alongside regional councils to verify the processes and methods used for data collection, laboratory analysis of samples collected and the statistical analysis and interpretation of the results presented.
If all Cawthron ticks are green, then you can trust this data. However, if one or more ticks are orange, then conclusions should be treated with some caution.
For more details on each tick, see our 'Can I Trust This Data?' Factsheet.
All samples were collected using approved field protocols and have been analysed in accredited laboratories. Therefore the data shown here has been collected and analysed following best practice.
This data is not sampled during high flows so the data shown only represents base flow conditions. Proposed national guidelines recommend sampling during both low and high flows to get a full picture of water quality.
This data is not flow adjusted. National guidelines suggest that flow-sensitive variables are flow 'adjusted' before trend analysis. Therefore, any trends shown here may be affected by variations in flow across sampling occasions.
LAWA Partners shall not be liable, whether in contract, tort, equity or otherwise, for any loss or damage of any type (including consequential losses) arising directly or indirectly from the inadequacy, inaccuracy or any other deficiency in information supplied irrespective of the cause. Use of information supplied is entirely at the risk of the recipient and shall be deemed to be acceptance of this liability exclusion.