What is water clarity?
Water clarity refers to the ability of light to travel through water and has two important aspects: light penetration and visual clarity.
Light penetration is important as it controls the amount of light in the water needed for aquatic plants to grow. Water clarity may be reduced when there is an increase inor how much algae is in the water.
As erosion occurs, tiny particles of clay, silt or small organic particles are washed into waterways. These tiny particles can be supported in the water current and are termed suspended sediment. The faster the water is moving the larger the amount and size of suspended sediment particles it can carry. Soil type in the catchment can affect the amount of suspended sediment.
For example, streams in catchments with clay soils are likely to have naturally poorer water clarity than streams in sandy catchments. In slow-flowing lowland streams where sediment can be very fine, water clarity can be poor for long periods. This is due to the slow rate of flushing and the fact that very fine particles are held in suspension almost indefinitely.
Why is poor water clarity a problem?
Poor water clarity can have many adverse effects on stream and lake ecosystems. For example, murky water can make the water unsuitable for drinking by stock and make areas unsafe for swimming. High algae concentrations can cause an algal bloom in slow-moving water (e.g. lakes), which lowers water clarity and can be toxin producing, causing illness in humans and animals.
High sediment can also harm aquatic life by clogging their gills which reduces their ability to take up oxygen. As fine particles settle in slower-moving downstream areas, the spaces between rocks and gravel are filled making the bottom habitat unsuitable for fish and other aquatic species. Poor water clarity will also affect the amount of light reaching the river or lake bottom, potentially limiting plant growth.
Theassesses suspended fine sediment in rivers via visual clarity across four suspended sediment classes (each with its own attribute bands). Councils who do not collect visual clarity data may convert turbidity to visual clarity. As an interim measure (until further guidance is provided) this may be undertaken using a national level conversion equation
How is water clarity tested?
Water clarity can be assessed either by using a Black Disc, clarity tube, by measuring turbidity or Secchi disc.
How far away (in metres) can a black target (black disc) be seen horizontally through the water. The further away the disc can be seen, the clearer the water. National guidelines recommend Black Disk as the preferred sampling methodology for water clarity assessment.
A 1-metre-long, 50-mm-diameter clear acrylic tube used to visually assess water clarity. The tube has a matte black target attached to a magnetic slider which is moved through the tube away from the eye until it cannot be seen anymore. The clearer the water, the further away (in metres) the target can be seen. The clarity tube is effective for relatively turbid water with a clarity less than 1 m. However, limitations in tube length make this method inappropriate for measuring clarity in clear waters.
Turbidity is an index of cloudiness of water and measures how light is scattered by fine particles in waterways. Turbidity is an alternative measurement for suspended sediment and/or visual clarity and is measured in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) or formazin nephelometric units (FNU). Compared to black disk measurements, turbidity can be measured continuously, for example through the night.
Water clarity is measured using a Secchi disc attached to a tape measure. The disc is lowered into the water until it disappears; this depth is noted from the tape measure. The disc is lowered a little further and then slowly raised until it reappears, this depth is noted. The average of the two readings is the final Secchi depth visibility depth.
Important to know
River water clarity is “correlated” with flow. As flow increases it leads to more and larger suspended sediment particles, resulting in clarity decreasing. Due to the close relationship between clarity and flow, analyses of long-term trends are ideally done using flow adjusted data.
Where do I find more information?
ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000). Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand.
Davies-Colley, R. 1988. Measuring water clarity with a black disk. Limnology and Oceanography 33: 616-623.
Ballantine DJ, Davies-Colley RJ 2009. Water quality trends at National River Water Quality Network sites for 1989-2007. Prepared for Prepared for Ministry of the Environment. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research. Client Report HAM2009-026. 21 p.
Davies-Colley, R. 2000. “Trigger” values for New Zealand rivers. Prepared for the Ministry for the Environment. NIWA Client Report: MfE002/22 May 2000.
Smith DG, McBride GB, Bryers GG, Wisse J, Mink DFJ 1996. Trends in New Zealand's National River Water Quality Network. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 30 (4): 485-500.