There are different instruments available for measuring levels of air pollutants. Regional councils and unitary authorities choose their instruments based on factors such as cost, ease of operation, reliability, accuracy and the smallest time scale of data needed, e.g., 10 mins or 24-hours. There are also mandatory monitoring methods (described below) which are required for determining compliance with New Zealand's.
Air quality monitoring stations
Air quality monitoring instruments are usually housed inside a specially designed monitoring station where temperature and humidity are controlled. Outdoor air is drawn inside the housing where it is sampled every few seconds and analysed by monitoring instruments. An average for the air pollutant is calculated (e.g., every 10 minutes) and transmitted by(automated data communication) to the council’s or contractor’s air quality database. The raw data is periodically checked and any ‘spikes’ that are caused by instrument servicing and calibrations are removed. Some gaseous pollutants can also be measured by methods such as that are relatively inexpensive, simple to operate and typically provide monthly averages that can then be used to calculate an annual average.
Air quality monitoring stations also often include meteorological equipment attached to a mast for measuring air temperature, wind speed, wind direction etc. This meteorological information is useful for interpreting the air pollutant measurements e.g., predicting where sources of pollutants may be coming from and why pollutant concentrations may be changing on an hourly, daily, seasonal or even annual basis.
Inner city Wellington monitoring station
Measuring airborne particles
Airbornecomes in many shapes and sizes and has varying toxicity. For health reasons we monitor the levels of particles that are small enough to be inhaled ( ) and in some situations levels of which are even smaller sized particles able to penetrate deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream.
There are different methods and instrument types that can be used to measure particle concentrations in air. These methods produce different results when compared to each other. Historically particles have been measured using a ‘gravimetric reference method’ such as a. Many of the studies that first linked concentrations of particles in air to adverse health effects in populations were based on PM10 collected by the gravimetric method. As technology advanced it became possible to measure particle concentrations continuously in real time. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has a test method for evaluating how continuous instruments compare with the gravimetric reference method when they are used side-by-side. If the continuous instruments compare well then they are officially recognised as ‘equivalent’ to the gravimetric method (https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/criteria.html). Some councils have co-located gravimetric reference monitoring instruments with continuous instruments to derive an adjustment factor that can be used to correct the continuous instrument data so it matches what might have been found if the gravimetric method was used.
Examples of continuous instruments that have been approved by the USEPA and are used by councils in New Zealand to measure PM10 and/or PM2.5 include:, , and . Examples of gravimetric instruments that also have approval include the . Other methods can be used for investigating air quality, such as an or , but are not suitable for NES-AQ compliance monitoring because they don’t have USEPA equivalency.
NES-AQ monitoring methods
The NES-AQ lists mandatory methods for monitoring PM10,, , and . These are the Australian Standards AS 3580 Methods for sampling and analysis of ambient air that relate to a specific type of instrument and describe how the instrument is to be operated and calibrated. The NES-AQ also allows PM10 to be monitored using instruments that have USEPA equivalency, such as a , , , and .