Monitored sites in the Aparima River catchment
Filter sites by:
No sites found.
The rolling hill country in its middle reaches is more agriculturally developed, and much of the lower catchment has been extensively modified over the last century, with the drainage of wetlands and the straightening and shortening of streams to assist in flood management activities.
Major tributaries of the Aparima River include the Hamilton Burn in the upper reaches and the Otautau Stream in the lower reaches. The Otautau Stream has very poor water quality. The main pressures on water quality in the Aparima catchment are due to dairy farm intensification as drain networks in the lower catchment can discharge degraded water to receiving streams. Overland flow and nutrient loss from wintering practices contribute significantly, particularly when soils are saturated. Flood and drainage works also potentially impact water quality in the Aparima catchment.
Environment Southland collects water quality information from five sites in the Aparima catchment. Nuisance algal growths, driven by low flows and high nutrient levels and temperatures, increase further down the catchment. Macroinvertebrate health indices progressively decline at sites down the catchment.
During the summer there is weekly monitoring at some sites. See the Environment Southland website for details.
Filter sites by:
No sites found.
This dashboard shows information on the data collected by the regional councils for water quality indicators, analysed as
The state for the catchment is represented by theconcentration for the across all sites within the catchment and then compares that value to the for all monitored sites in New Zealand.
Click on the parameters state icons to compare this catchment with others in the region.
State shows how theof samples from this site compares to other sites
Trend shows how the quality of water is changing over time. Depending on the sampling history duration, five and ten year timescales are available:
The Cawthron Institute has worked alongside regional councils to verify the processes and methods used for data collection, laboratory analysis of samples collected and the statistical analysis and interpretation of the results presented.
If all Cawthron ticks are green, then you can trust this data. However, if one or more ticks are orange, then conclusions should be treated with some caution.
For more details on each tick, see our 'Can I Trust This Data?' Factsheet.
All samples were collected using approved field protocols and have been analysed in accredited laboratories. Therefore the data shown here has been collected and analysed following best practice.
All samples were collected using approved field protocols and have been analysed in accredited laboratories.
This data is not flow adjusted. National guidelines suggest that flow-sensitive variables are flow 'adjusted' before trend analysis. Therefore, any trends shown here may be affected by variations in flow across sampling occasions.
LAWA Partners shall not be liable, whether in contract, tort, equity or otherwise, for any loss or damage of any type (including consequential losses) arising directly or indirectly from the inadequacy, inaccuracy or any other deficiency in information supplied irrespective of the cause. Use of information supplied is entirely at the risk of the recipient and shall be deemed to be acceptance of this liability exclusion.